John Hallquist Lithen vs Oliver Johansson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Lithen and Johansson compare in second serve points? Lithen has secured 43.5% of points, while Johansson edges ahead with 46.45%.
• What about return games? Johansson has a slight advantage, winning 50.48% of opponents' second serve points compared to Lithen’s 45.85%.
• In terms of first serve returns, Johansson again leads with 31.59% over Lithen’s 28.18%.
• Under pressure, Lithen saves 53.17% of breakpoints, surpassing Johansson, who saves 46.88%.
• Both players have nearly identical win rates over the past year: Lithen at 51.16% and Johansson at 51.72%.
• On their best surface, hard courts, Lithen has a 75% win rate, narrowly ahead of Johansson's 71%.
• When evaluating experience against opponent rankings, Johansson has faced tougher competition, with an average opponent rank of 79.59 compared to Lithen's 288.26.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Johansson might have an edge, winning 44% compared to Lithen’s 25%.
• In break point conversion, Johansson capitalizes on 40.35% of opportunities, better than Lithen’s 33.88% conversion rate.

Editorial Prediction (September 16, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing second serve effectiveness, Johansson appears to have an edge over Lithen, achieving a higher percentage of points won. This aspect often plays a crucial role in determining match outcomes, highlighting Johansson's potential to prevail in service games.

When it comes to returns, both on the first and second serves, Johansson exhibits superior performance. By converting more return opportunities into points, he lays the groundwork for breaking Lithen's serve more effectively.

While Lithen demonstrates resilience under pressure with better breakpoint recovery, Johansson's capability to face higher-ranked opponents gives him a robust competitive advantage, attributed to his exposure to stronger players over the past year.

Even though Lithen performs well on hard courts, Johansson’s experience against tougher competition and his stronger deciding set performance buoy him up for a potential win.

Considering the statistical metrics, particularly the return game and opponent quality handled by Johansson, he emerges as the more likely winner of this imminent tennis encounter.